Rarely described are people’s lived experiences from severe injury events such as train crashes. the result shows how 136668-42-3 manufacture all experienced a second opportunity in existence. Experiencing a train crash meant the passengers experienced severe vulnerability and a danger to life and interdependence turned out to play a crucial role. Focusing on helping other travellers on site was one method to regain the loss of control and kept the chaos at bay. Family, friends, and fellow travellers turned out to be extremely important during the recovery process why such closeness should be advertised and facilitated. Keywords: Content analysis, experiences, interviews, nursing, train accident Several studies exist focusing on mental or psychiatric perspectives of survivors of severe injury events using different kinds of quantitative methods (Bergh Johanesson, Lundin, Fr?jd, Hultman & Michel, 2011; Rosser, Dewer & Thompson, 1991; Wang, Tsay & Relationship, 2005). However, study from a nursing technology perspective, which 136668-42-3 manufacture focuses on survivors experiences of having experienced severe injury events, is definitely scarce (Isovaara, Arman & Rehnsfelth, 2006; Roxberg, Burman, Guldbrand, Fridlund & Barbosa de Silva, 2010). A study of Swedish survivors of the Asian Tsunami 2004 (The National Board of Health and Fgfr2 Welfare, 2008) showed that survivors outlooks on existence after such an event were weakened for some but strengthened for others. One’s personal strength as well as help from family, friends, and work colleagues was a key point that helped the survivors deal with the producing stress following a horrific event. Additionally, visiting the event site helped the survivors process what experienced happened to them. R?holm, Arman, and Rensfeldt (2008) showed that the significance of the Asian Tsunami was deeply existential and was described as suddenly having to struggle between existence and death while devoid of any control. This sudden upheaval of one’s universe occurred in the context of absolute paradise that abruptly became the scene of total chaos and pressured the survivors to form a new outlook on life. Survivors reactions are considered severe immediately after a tragic event, but most reactions become more subdued within 1 year (Connor, Foa & Davidson, 2006). Bonanno (2004) means that resilience in the face of 136668-42-3 manufacture stress is more common than is often believed, and you will find multiple and sometimes unpredicted pathways to resilience which means that several survivors only show small and transient disruptions after traumatic events. On the other hand additional studies of long-term effects of traumatic events reveal that survivors continue to experience effects of the stress 5C10 years later on (Holen, 1990; Hull, Alexander & Klein, 2002) and some have lifelong effects actually 25C50 years later on (Lazaratou et al., 2008; Lundin & Jansson, 2007). Relating to Arozenius (1977), as many as 75% of the survivors of a train disaster experienced some kind of mental or psychosomatic disorder, and the majority of the survivors thought regularly about the traumatic event actually after a 12 months experienced approved. Furthermore, we deduce from additional studies of injury events including trains that posttraumatic stress symptoms were present (Hagstr?m, 1995; Lundin, 1991; Raphael, 1977; Selly, King, Peveier, Osola & Thomson, 1997). The most obvious impact on the survivors was of having been close to death and survived. Nightmares and intrusive thoughts became problematic for the survivors. After the event, troubles traveling by train and fear noises much like those of train travel were also common (Hagstr?m, 1995). Globally, the quick development of train traffic, including rising speeds and increasing traffic, 136668-42-3 manufacture in the world results in a growing pattern of train crashes that 136668-42-3 manufacture is named disasters if 10 are killed and/or 100 are nonfatally hurt. Nevertheless, the average death rate is definitely decreasing resulting in a larger quantity of survivors (Forsberg & Bj?rnstig, 2011),.